The power of a pause against anger and impulsivity

 "Peace - Buddha" by Mimi Stuart ©

“Peace” – Buddha by Mimi Stuart ©

Anger and stress hormones

Staying calm is key to making wise decisions and essential to maintaining healthy relationships. Yet there are times when it’s impossible to stay calm. A teenager has lied to you, your spouse insults you, a co-worker yells at you. Anger or shock can trigger your fight or flight response, which activates powerful stress hormones.

Those hormones trigger many physiological, biochemical, and psychological changes. They increase alertness, and generate fear, aggressiveness, and anger. Such biologically-driven changes may be helpful when you are physically threatened. Yet they can be harmful to your relationships and social and work-related interactions. When too much of the primary stress hormone cortisol is rushing through your body, you are much more likely to say or do something that you will later regret.

Delay your response – time for a pause

You need to find a way to delay responding until your stress level has subsided to normal levels.

Exercise: The quickest way to decrease the levels of cortisol and related stress chemicals in your body is to do five minutes of strenuous exercise allowing you to sweat lightly. For instance, you can go for a run or do push-ups, sit-ups or jumping jacks.

Meditation: Another way to forestall harmful reactivity in emotionally-heated situations is to meditate for at least fifteen to twenty minutes. Focus on breathing deeply while relaxing and letting go of any thoughts or emotions that pass through your mind.

Distraction: At a minimum, pursue other activities and wait until you feel calm before dealing with a particularly heated emotional situation.

Once calm, you will be able to ask questions and find out the how and why of the situation. You want to avoid simply jumping to conclusions and striking out against the people involved.

Impulsiveness

A pause is also a powerful defense against making impulsive decisions. The desires for pleasure, food, sex, and approval from others have their bases in biology and can thus easily become excessive. Uncontrolled pleasure-seeking and impulsive decision-making can end up being more harmful than beneficial.

Thus, pausing before taking action is a key in preventing bad impulsive decision-making. Here are some examples of impulses that may be wise to forestall:

Eating too much: You’ve just eaten a big plate of delicious pasta and you want to have seconds although you know you shouldn’t.

Drinking too much: You crave that third or forth glass of wine regardless of the consequences.

Buying too much: You want to buy an expensive jacket although you can’t afford it and you don’t need it.

Pleasing others too much: You feel pressured into saying “yes” to a request to volunteer, although you are already over-burdened with other obligations.

Wasting too much time: You feel like going on social media rather than doing something productive or spending time with family or friends.

Slipping into inappropriate relationships: You can’t resist responding to a married person’s inappropriately-flirtatious text with a suggestive text of your own.

By simply delaying taking action or making a decision, the impulse to act immediately tends to diminish. Forestalling taking action is easier than resisting an impulse, because you’re not saying “no” to yourself or to others. You are simply saying, “I’m going to wait for five minutes/15 minutes/a day before making the decision.” With a little time and distance, other priorities and desires will tend to decrease your overwhelming urge to act impulsively.

Impulsive behavior becomes stronger when a person is bored. So taking the time to engage in another activity and gain distance from the temptation will also help the impulse fade away.

Prepare yourself

If you know what kind of situations present temptation or tend to make you angry, try to imagine the situation likely to occur and imagine how you are going to respond.

Example: If my teenager does something terrible, I will say, “Let’s talk tonight/tomorrow.” Then I will go for a run. I may try to get the situation in perspective by talking to a friend. I will put myself in his/her shoes and imagine how I can be most effective in a conversation. I will have a calm tone of voice and allow him or her to explain before interrupting or making any assumptions.

Example: If there is a buffet tonight, I will pace myself during the meal, and take a fifteen-minute break before deciding if and how much seconds I’ll have.

by Alison Poulsen, PhD Psychology

Read “Live in the now, not in the future!”

Read “Anger: ‘I have a right to be angry.’”

Read “Impulsivity: ‘I knew the negative consequences, but couldn’t resist.’”

Self-control: “I really want to get this new ipod today Mom.”

"Indomitable Spirit" — Apa Sherpa by Mimi Stuart
Live the Life you Desire

A crucial quality in achieving fulfillment and self-confidence is self-control — the ability to tolerate the discomfort of having unmet needs and desires. That ability is determined by brain development, genetics, personality, and upbringing.

The first time infants feel hungry or lonely, they feel discomfort, which turns into distress, which causes them to cry — until an adult responds. After many repetitions of this cycle, infants learn that an adult will respond to their needs.

With some confidence in the world around them, they are then able to handle small delays and “mistakes” that inevitably occur. It is through this combination of feeling secure and facing delays that children develop the ability to self-soothe and distract themselves in the face of unmet needs and desires.

Setting genetics and in-born personality aside, there are three ways in which this development of self-control can falter:

1. Coddling: The adult continues to respond instantly even as the child grows to be a toddler and young child. Without a gradual increase in the child’s autonomy and a delay of gratification, the child does not learn to do things independently and to self-soothe in situations where there is no instant gratification.

2. Dramatic Inconsistency: While small mistakes and delays are healthy, dramatic swings in parental response will make a child feel deeply insecure about the world.

3. Neglect: Children who can’t get much of a response from adults often lose hope and become angry or turn inward.

The attuned parent helps the child develop the capacity to be able to defer gratification and handle frustration. Newborns need to be responded to quickly. But as they become a bit older and particularly when their needs are replaced by mere desires, such as wanting candy rather than needing nourishment, we can start saying “no” and/or expect them to handle waiting or working toward what they want.

As infants become children and then teens, they should be able to handle more time lapse, more disappointment, and more frustration, because their desires are becoming more complex, less necessary, and often something that they should learn to work or save for themselves.

How do we create an environment that best fosters self-regulation?

By gradually increasing our expectations of our children and tolerating our own anxiety of disappointing them when they don’t get what they want. Changes often causes some anxiety. But incremental changes allow children to learn to handle increasing amounts of anxiety, and thereby gain skills, self-control, and realistic confidence in themselves and the world around them.

It is important to be able to say “No.” Yet always being told “No” is discouraging. It is more encouraging to be given appropriate caveats, “Yes, you may have this, but I’d like you to clean your room first/wait until I’m finished doing my work/save money for it and wait until next summer.”

A little deprivation can help children learn to work and wait for what they want. As a result they learn to see that the future is an important part of their reality.

by Alison Poulsen, PhD

Watch “Authoritarian vs. Permissive Parenting.”

Read “Impulsivity: ‘I knew the negative consequences, and just couldn’t resist.'”

Impulsivity:
“I knew the negative consequences, but couldn’t resist.”

"Wisdom" — Einstein by Mimi Stuart
Live the Life you Desire

The Stanford Marshmallow Experiment was a momentous study on the significance of the ability to delay gratification.* A preschool child would be seated at a table in front of a marshmallow, and was given the choice to eat the marshmallow immediately or to receive a second one if he or she could resist eating it for fifteen minutes.

A minority ate the marshmallow immediately while 30% were able to control their impulses long enough to get the second marshmallow. Most tried to resist temptation but soon gave up.

Many years later, the original researcher, Dr. Mischel, discovered that the children who were able to delay gratification became significantly more competent, emotionally balanced, and dependable than those who could not resist instant gratification. They also scored 250 points higher on the SATs, worked well under pressure and in groups, were more confident, and reported being happier in their lives.

Brain imaging showed key differences between the two groups in two areas: the prefrontal cortex (more active in high delayers) and the ventral striatum (more active in the more impulsive children, an area also linked to addictions.)

Mischel’s studies suggest that the ability to wait for a reward involves the “strategic allocation of attention”, that is, the ability to purposely focus one’s attention away from the desirable object. The successful preschoolers, for instance, would distract themselves by moving around, pretending the marshmallow was a stuffed animal, covering their eyes, tapping their fingers, or looking at anything other than the marshmallow.

They also had the ability to consider and hold in their minds the future outcome rather than being swept away by the present temptation. Either through a genetic predisposition or by having been raised in an environment where they learned to wait for what they wanted, they had the capacity to act on the basis of long-term satisfaction rather than instantaneous pleasure.

Ideally, we can learn to enjoy much of the present while working toward a desirable future. In fact, once we’re able to consider both the present and the future simultaneously, then instant gratification loses some of its allure when we know that it could harm our future.

The distinction between the past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.

~Albert Einstein

by Alison Poulsen, PhD

* The Stanford Marshmallow Experiment was conducted in 1972 by psychologist Walter Mischel.

Recommended video showing the Marshmallow test by Dr. Walsch who wrote the book “No: Why Kids–of All Ages–Need to Hear It and Ways Parents Can Say It.”

Read “I feel terrible about not being able to buy my kids what all their friends have. But I can’t afford to buy them new ipods and shoes right now.”